1066, the Norman conquest of England

Eng go through...was a ground country, dirt was its absorbing kindle; and originally plots of land had been suffered in a flash by the men who colonized and cleared them, and genetical by their children. precisely such independent farmers had no demur against the Viking raids, or resources to soar upwards them over disasters like cattle sickness, a serial of bad harvests, recruit or storm. In the feast of time, almost e truly musical composition in the country had habituated himself by correlative promises to somebody much powerful, who could help to protect him and his family in times of stress. Small landowners had surrendered the nominal develop ownership of their land to their protectors - who in put to work held the land in business to somebody higher. This evolution has much been called a loss of freedom, and so it was; but absolute personal freedom had exercise to be, as perhaps it has eer so been, a dangerous illusion. Its loss was really a gain; the acceptance of the duties and mutual admit of a brotherly system, the end of anarchy(13-14).         The first divide sums up the life of the commoners in England and also real equal to Normandy. both countries were actually much same but yet distinct in their own subtle ways.

In my undertake I allow for hold forth the similarities and differences amidst Anglo-Saxon England and Normandy including their feudal system. I will also compare and limit line Harold of England and William the Conqueror as portrayed in 1066.         England and Normandy had very similar feudal system. In both systems everyone held his plot of land in duty to soul higher (61). The English had serfs and the Normans had peasants at the very bottom. They were the workers (slaves) that grew the crops and took perplexity of the land for the speeding class. The Normans had lords and... If you want to get a honest essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.