Civ

        Constitutional Parliamentary monarchy and tyranny are two styles of system which came about in England and France respectively. However, who throw out say which one pains of g everyplacenment is better or worse? John Lockes conceit on brass is that policy-making causality is the major power, which e genuinely worldly concern having in the state of nature, has inclined up into the give of society, and in that to the governors, whom society hath set over itself . . . (Locke) Bossuet, on the other hand, says that power is given from the grace of god. The ruler, or person with the power, is the minister of beau ideal.         The tying up that morality has in government now is very clear, in that respect is a insulation between the two. From the middle ages until deep religion had been a very strongly involved in government. In both Englands natural parliamentary monarchy and in Frances supreme monarchy religion played a big part in the government. The situations in France and England were much the uniform in that religion was dogmatic the government. In France, the Catholics and atomic chassis 1 II disliked the French Protestants. This continued with atomic number 1 IIs kin. This hatred of the Protestants led up to the Saint Bartholomews Massacre of high-and-mighty 24th 1572, where 3000 Huguenots were killed.

Henry IV was made head of the Catholic Church in France, which salve had a major notice in the decision of whom became king. With French Absolutism, the king is, appointed by God to rule over the kingdom as God would if He was here. Everything that the king does is through with(p) because God would have unprecedented it that way. To question the kings/queens judgements or ideas would be to question God. It was seen as a perfect form of government, the integration of power in the reach of the divinely... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.